Legal Opinion

BP Amoco Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 11, 2000No. 99-1368PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON.

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The petitioners, BP Amoco Corp., successor by merger to Amoco Corporation, and its subsidiaries (collectively BP Amoco) 1 seek review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB, Board) holding that BP Amoco committed an unfair labor practice by unilaterally altering its employee medical benefit plan in violation of the collective bargaining agreements between Amoco Corporation and five locals of Intervenor Paper, Allied Chemical and Energy Workers International…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Litton Financial Printing Div., Litton Business Systems, Inc. v. NLRBSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service, American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  3. Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Delta Air Lines, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  4. Local Union No. 47, International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Clc v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. Cunha v. Ward Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Wade Boldt v. Northern States Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Bath Marine Draftsmen's Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  3. Titanium Metals Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  4. Enloe Medical Center v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Mississippi Power Company, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-Cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API