Legal Opinion
United States v. Rogelio Lemus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 2, 2016No. 14-50355PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The Opinion filed on March 2, 2016 is replaced with the concurrently filed amended opinion.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are otherwise DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are otherwise DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Rogelio Lemus appeals his conviction for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. NevilsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Alfredo Delgado Arellanes and Geneva Arellanes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Heon-Cheol ChiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Quintara Biosciences, Inc. v. Ruifeng Biztech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. Andre BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Angela VenturaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Gerardo LoretoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.