Legal Opinion

Houston v. Whittier

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2009No. 35287-2008PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment on causes of action based upon Oregon statutes. We hold that the most significant relationship test applicable to a conflict of laws issue does not apply and that the district court did not err in allowing recovery based upon the Oregon statutes. We also hold that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment on those claims. We affirm the judgment of the district court, but do not award attorney fees on appeal.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

From February 2003 through the Fall of 2005, John Hunting Whittier (Defendant) was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hughes v. FetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Griggs v. NashIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Joyce Livestock Co. v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Fresk v. KraemerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Parsons v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Hurtado v. LAND O'LAKES, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bagley v. ThomasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Carroll v. MBNA America BankIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Troy v. RFD-TV The Theater, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API