Legal Opinion

Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. Swanson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1997No. 95-0355PublishedCited by 669 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEnoch, Justice

This is a commercial dispute. In settling this dispute, the Swansons signed a release that disclaimed reliance on the representations of Schlumberger. The question is whether this disclaimer precludes, as a matter of law, the Swansons from recovering damages against Schlumberger for fraudulently inducing them to settle. ■ The trial court granted a judgment for Schlumberger notwithstanding the jury’s verdict for the Swansons. The court of appeals reversed, holding that the disclaimer of reliance did not preclude the Swansons’ fraudulent inducement claim. 895 S.W.2d 719. We agree with the trial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Jefferson Associates, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by669 opinions

  1. Lone Star Fund v (U.S.), L.P. v. Barclays Bank PLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. St. Joseph Hospital v. WolffTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. DeWitt County Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. ParksTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Hamilton v. Segue Software Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

664 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API