Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gerbosi v. Gaims, Weil, West & Epstein, LLP

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 2011No. B219587PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIGELOW, P. J.

This appeal arises from two of many lawsuits seeking damages allegedly caused by the activities of private investigator Anthony Pellicano arid others. Michael Gerbosi has filed a complaint against Pellicano and Gaims, Weil, West & Epstein, LLP (Gaims),1 a law firm that allegedly accepted the fruits of Pellicano’s activities. Erin Finn has also filed a complaint against Gaims. This appeal follows protracted proceedings on separate anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) motions filed by Gaims to strike Gerbosi’s and Finn’s complaints. (See Code Civ.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Hecimovich v. Encinal School Parent Teacher OrganizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Tuszynska v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Comstock v. AberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Bergstein v. Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Lefebvre v. LefebvreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API