Legal Opinion
Vincent v. Litchfield Farms, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 15, 1990No. 7945PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The issue of this appeal is whether the trial court was correct in granting the third party defendants’ motion for summary judgment against the plaintiff on the basis that the period of limitations set forth in General Statutes § 52-584 had run as to any action by the plaintiff against them.
The plaintiff allegedly was injured in the parking lot of Litchfield Farms, Inc. (Farm Shop) on May 2,1986. On June 8,1987, she brought suit against Farm Shop. On March 21, 1988, Farm Shop’s motion to implead Michael and Rhoda Loeb, the lessors of Farm Shop, *526as third party defendants was granted and, on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Duffy v. Horton Memorial HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Straub v. Desa Industries, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Zaveta v. PortelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by8 opinions
- Turner v. Aldor Co. of Nashville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Protter v. Brown Thompson & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Baker v. Franco, No. Cv91-0307614 S (Nov. 25, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Moger v. Cappella, No. Cv88-0026827 (Apr. 9, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Radiology Clinics, P.C. v. Kollmer, No. 65559 (Dec. 22, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.