Legal Opinion

Protter v. Brown Thompson & Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 30, 1991No. 9907PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.

The fourth party plaintiff in this personal injury action appeals from a decision of the trial court granting a fourth party defendant’s motion to strike *362the first count of the fourth party complaint on the ground that the cause of action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations as set forth in General Statutes § 52-577.1 Thus, the sole issue presented is whether the trial court properly found that, in a fourth party action for indemnification, the limitations period of § 52-577 begins to run on the date of the negligent conduct underlying the original cause of action rather than on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. L. F. Pace & Sons, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
  2. Vilcinskas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Prokolkin v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Keating v. Glass Container Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Goold v. GooldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Tarzia v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  4. Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. State v. CrosbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API