Legal Opinion

Moger v. Cappella, No. Cv88-0026827 (Apr. 9, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided April 9, 1992No. CV88-0026827Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The issue raised by this summary judgment is one on which our Appellate Court has already passed twice, namely whether or not a party who seeks to implead a third party defendant must do so within the applicable statute of limitations where the third party plaintiff is seeking indemnification. CT Page 3215

In this case, the plaintiff Dawn Moger sued Kenneth P. Cappella and Andrew B. Cappella as a result of personal injuries sustained in an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prokolkin v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Protter v. Brown Thompson & Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. McEvoy v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1918
  4. Vincent v. Litchfield Farms, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API