Legal Opinion

Mead Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 14, 1998No. Slip. Op. 98-101. Court No. 95-12-01783PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

WATSON, Senior Judge.

This action involves the tariff classification of imported loose-leaf books containing calendars, room for daily notes, telephone numbers, addresses and notepads. This sort of product originated in England and is probably best known under the trademark of Filofax. 1

The importations were classified as bound diaries under Subheading 4820.10.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (“HTSUS”). That provision, in context, reads as follows:

4820 Registers, account books, notebooks, order books, receipt books, letter pads, memorandum pads,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hemscheidt Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. Baumgarten v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  3. Charles Scribner's Sons v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  4. Brooks Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Central Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Avenues in Leather, Inc., Plaintiff v. United States, DefendantUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  4. Ronquillo v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API