Mead Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
WATSON, Senior Judge.
This action involves the tariff classification of imported loose-leaf books containing calendars, room for daily notes, telephone numbers, addresses and notepads. This sort of product originated in England and is probably best known under the trademark of Filofax. 1
The importations were classified as bound diaries under Subheading 4820.10.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States (“HTSUS”). That provision, in context, reads as follows:
4820 Registers, account books, notebooks, order books, receipt books, letter pads, memorandum pads,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hemscheidt Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Baumgarten v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Charles Scribner's Sons v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Brooks Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- Central Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Avenues in Leather, Inc., Plaintiff v. United States, DefendantUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Ronquillo v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020