Legal Opinion
Hemscheidt Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 18, 1995No. 94-1511PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from the decision of the United States Court of International Trade granting Hemscheidt Corporation’s (Hemscheidt) motion for summary judgment, and holding that the change in the classification under which duties for Hem-scheidt’s imports are levied was not effective because Customs failed to provide notice as required by 19 U.S.C. § 1315(d) (1994). We affirm.
I
Hemscheidt imports self-propelled hydraulic shield supports for use in underground coal mining machines. The mining machines have three components: (1) a cutting device for coal cutting…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robert Conroy v. Reebok International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Koyo Seiko Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Chaparral Steel Company v. The United States, and Norsk Jernverk A.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Heraeus-Amersil, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. The United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Beloit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DGS Contract Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Anhydrides & Chemicals, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Jewelpak Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.