Rothstein v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gloria Cohen Aronin, J.
In this negligence action, defendants Chromalloy Pharmaceutical Inc. (CPI), Chromalloy American Corp. (CAC) and Sequa Corporation move for an order of this court pursuant to CPLR 3212 granting summary judgment in their favor dismissing plaintiff’s complaint because CPI, CAC and Sequa had no connection with the manufacture, sale or distribution of thorotrast, the carcinogen which allegedly caused the untimely death of Ari Rothstein; nor are CAC, Sequa and CPI successors of the corporation which did. Further, CPI, CAC and Sequa are separate corporate…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Morris v. New York State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Walkovszky v. CarltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hart v. Bruno Machinery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998