Legal Opinion

State v. Simpson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 2002No. 27008, 27012, 27013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Ronald Simpson, Jeremiah Simpson, and Jeffrey Jackson appeal from their judgments of conviction for two counts each of possession of unlawfully taken elk. The defendants argue that the magistrate and district courts misconstrued the Nez Perce Treaty of 1855 in concluding that Jackson was not acting within his rights as a member of the Nez Perce Tribe when he shot the elk. They also argue that the magistrate erred by refusing to instruct the jury on mistake of fact as a defense based on the defendants’ belief that the elk were shot on public land where tribal hunting rights…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. State v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  5. State v. ArthurIdaho Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WattersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  2. Crowe v. Idaho Dept. of Fish and GameDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2024
  3. Simpson v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API