Legal Opinion

State v. Watters

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 4, 2007No. 03M5471, 03M5472 A127144 (Control) A127145PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Defendants — father and son — are Native Americans and members of the Nez Perce Tribe. They appeal convictions for game violations arising out of the killing of two elk out of season and on private property. Defendants contend that, pursuant to an 1855 treaty between the Nez Perce and the United States, they are entitled to hunt and take game from open and unclaimed land that was part of their original hunting grounds, which includes the private property where the elk were killed. The trial court disagreed and, following a trial to the court, convicted defendants. On appeal, defendants make…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Sanchez-Llamas v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Organized Village of Kake v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BegayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Jamestown S'klallam TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API