Legal Opinion
State v. Arthur
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1953No. 7959PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
Respondent, David Arthur, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, is a Nez Perce Indian and a member of the Nez Perce tribe of Indians. He was charged with killing a deer out of season, on September 26, 1951, in Idaho County, on National Forest lands, outside the boundaries of the reservation but within the exterior boundaries of lands ceded to the federal government by such Indian tribe, in violation of Section 36-104, I.C., and the regulations of the Idaho Fish and Game Commission.
Defendant filed a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that the facts charged therein do…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Tulee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Valentine v. United States Ex Rel. NeideckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Ward v. Race HorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- United States v. State of WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- State v. TinnoIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. CoffeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.