Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 27, 1933No. 6930PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by Ines Martin against the Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York to recover $5,000 under an accident insurance policy ealled a “personal automobile accident pol-iey,” issued to her husband, Teddy Martin, by that company, in which she was named as beneficiary in case of the death of the insured.
The insurance contract in question contained the following provisions:
“The Fidelity and Casualty Company of' New York does hereby insure the persons, named in Statement A of the copy of the application in the principal sum and weekly indemnity hereinafter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Poncino v. Sierra Nevada Life & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Lloyd v. Columbus Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by13 opinions
- English v. Old American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Thomas v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Idaho, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Travelers Mut. Casualty Co. v. RectorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Ass'n v. HudmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Concord General Mutual Insurance Company v. HillsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.