Legal Opinion
Concord General Mutual Insurance Company v. Hills
District Court, D. Maine
Decided June 30, 1972No. Civ. 12-153, 12-158PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER OF THE COURT
GIGNOUX, District Judge.
By these declaratory judgment actions Concord General Mutual Insurance Company (Concord) and The Travelers Insurance Company (Travelers) seek declarations as to the extent of their obligations to defend any suits arising out of an automobile accident which occurred on February 12, 1971 at Woodstock, Maine. Defendants in the Concord action are Edwin A. Emerson, Jr., the owner of the automobile and the named insured in the Concord policy; his 16-year old stepson, Randall Henley, whom Emerson had permitted to use the insured…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Odolecki v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Schilling v. StockelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Carroway v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Brooks v. Delta Fire & Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Offices Unlimited, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Dayton Hudson Corp. v. American Mutual Liability Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State v. Glens Falls InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- Creech v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. LyonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.