Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. Seitz
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 26, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 75-524PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
Steinberg et al. (hereinafter Steinberg) appeal from that portion of the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences which awarded priority of count 3 to Seitz et al., the junior party.1 We affirm.
The Subject Matter
The count in issue reads:
3. Apparatus for use in determining the prothrombin time [clotting time] of a blood sample comprising: a container for holding the blood sample, a freely movable ferromagnetic member disposed in the container, a magnetic field source located near the container and forming a weak magnetic couple with the ferromagnetic member, means for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Young v. DworkinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- William S. Gubelmann, Deceased, by Walter S. Gubelmann v. Herman GangCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Hugh S. Knowles v. George C. TibbettsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
- Hull v. DavenportCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- F. Brantley Scott and John H. Burton v. Roy P. FinneyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Slip Track Systems, Inc. And Todd A. Brady v. Metal-Lite, Inc., Thomas R. Herren, and Gene N. Carpenter, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- Peeler v. MillerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Friction Division Products, Inc. v. E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.