Katz v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners are partners doing business as Lee’s Department Store at Huntington Park, California. They seek to review and set aside an order of the respondent Board determining that petitioners had engaged in certain unfair labor practices ajid requiring them to cease and desist therefrom. The answer of the Board requests that its ■order against -petitioners be enforced.
Petitioners say that the Board was without jurisdiction over them because they were not engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 141 et seq., 151 et…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Guy F. Atkinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Superior Engraving Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Cusano v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gaynor News Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Weeland L. Hyde v. Hibernia National Bank in Jefferson Parish and Credit Bureau Services--New Orleans, D/B/A Chilton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Container Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.