Legal Opinion

B.P. Oil Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 1993No. 1605 C.D. 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

B.P. Oil Company (employer) appeals an order of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board that affirmed a referee’s decision to award compensation benefits to the claimant, Francis Defrank, based on the claimant’s complete loss of hearing which resulted from the claimant’s exposure to high levels of noise while working for the employer.

The employer raises the following issues on appeal: (1) whether the referee erred in concluding that the claim petition was not barred under the three-year statute of limitations provision of section 315 of The Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. HJ Heinz CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Eddy v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Berisford v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Universal Cyclops Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sellari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Anastasio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (NGK Metals Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Bullen Companies v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Keith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API