Legal Opinion

Keith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Judge.

Melvin Keith (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a referee’s decision denying him specific loss benefits under Section 306(c)(8) of The Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 We reverse and remand.

Claimant worked for The Budd Company (Employer) for approximately thirty-five years. During the course of that employment, Claimant was frequently exposed to loud noise.

On February 2, 1990, Claimant filed a claim petition, alleging that he has suffered a complete loss of hearing as the result of occupational noise…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Berisford v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sellari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Socha v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Lukens Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Socha v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API