Keith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Judge.
Melvin Keith (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed a referee’s decision denying him specific loss benefits under Section 306(c)(8) of The Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act (Act).1 We reverse and remand.
Claimant worked for The Budd Company (Employer) for approximately thirty-five years. During the course of that employment, Claimant was frequently exposed to loud noise.
On February 2, 1990, Claimant filed a claim petition, alleging that he has suffered a complete loss of hearing as the result of occupational noise…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Boeing Helicopter Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Berisford v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sellari v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Socha v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Lukens Steel Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- LTV Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Socha v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001