Legal Opinion

Bullen Companies v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 2008No. 409 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SMITH-RIBNER.

The Bullen Companies (Employer) seek review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) awarding total disability benefits to Michael Hausmann (Claimant). Employer questions whether the WCJ erred in finding that Claimant satisfied the requirements of Section 311 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 631, with respect to the time for giving Employer notice of his injury and in finding that Claimant met his burden of proving…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. General Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Sell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Marriott Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Price v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Liveringhouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. E. Hempfield Twp. v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. City of Pittsburgh and UPMC Benefit Mgmt. Services, Inc. v. WCAB (Flaherty)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. W.J. Church v. WCAB (W. Cook t/a Cook Landscaping and Fleming Termite and Pest Control)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. K. Stahl v. WCAB (East Hempfield Twp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API