Legal Opinion

Lowther v. Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The court’s discretionary ruling was premature. “. . . (I)t is impossible to anticipate what issues may be raised, when answer or other pleadings are filed. But, until the allegations of the complaint are traversed, the occasion for the exercise of discretion will not arise upon the motion for removal for the convenience of witnesses and the promotion of justice. If issues of fact are raised when the answer is filed, which will necessitate a jury trial and the attendance of witnesses, the court may in its discretion grant (the) motion to remove . . . for convenience of witnesses and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HorrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Poteat v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API