Creason v. Peterson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice:
Defendants Peterson deeded to the plaintiffs by a metes and bounds description a tract of land containing about one acre located on Ninth East near 5600 South in Murray, Utah. Subsequently, in connection with a sale to a third party, plaintiffs discovered that there was a variance- of a few *307feet between the property lines as described in the deed and the actual fence lines on the property as they thought they had purchased it. They then demanded that the defendants cure the defects, which the latter failed to do. Plaintiffs then set about obtaining quitclaim deeds from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gardner v. FliegelIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Hogan v. BlakneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
- Wilson v. . ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1828
- Faller v. Davis Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wood v. ASHBYUtah Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Ault v. HoldenUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Gallegos v. LloydCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
- Hancock v. Planned Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Chournos v. D'AGNILLOUtah Supreme Court · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.