State v. Prevost
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Johnson, J.
The defendant, David Prevost, appeals his conviction for armed robbery, see RSA 636:1, III (1996), on the basis that the *560Superior Court (Barry, J.) impermissibly amended the underlying indictment. We reverse and remand.
The defendant was indicted for the armed robbery of Sully’s Superette in Manchester. Armed robbery, a class A felony, is defined by statute as robbery, a class B felony, where the defendant additionally: “(a) Was actually armed with a deadly weapon; or (b) Reasonably appeared to the victim to be armed with a deadly weapon; or (c) Inflicted or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- State v. ShannonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- State v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. QuinteroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- State v. McCabeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. Jose Batista-SalvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- State v. GlanvilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997