Legal Opinion

State v. Prevost

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 23, 1997No. 95-676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Johnson, J.

The defendant, David Prevost, appeals his conviction for armed robbery, see RSA 636:1, III (1996), on the basis that the *560Superior Court (Barry, J.) impermissibly amended the underlying indictment. We reverse and remand.

The defendant was indicted for the armed robbery of Sully’s Superette in Manchester. Armed robbery, a class A felony, is defined by statute as robbery, a class B felony, where the defendant additionally: “(a) Was actually armed with a deadly weapon; or (b) Reasonably appeared to the victim to be armed with a deadly weapon; or (c) Inflicted or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. State v. ShannonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. State v. EricksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. State v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. QuinteroSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  2. State v. McCabeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. State v. Jose Batista-SalvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
  4. State v. GlanvilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  5. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API