Legal Opinion
State v. Quintero
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided October 12, 2011No. 2009-832PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.
The defendant, George Quintero, appeals his convictions on one count of felonious sexual assault (FSA), RSA 632-A:3 (2007), and one count of aggravated felonious sexual assault (AFSA), RSA 632-A:2 (2007). He argues that the Superior Court (Nadeau, J.) erred when it conditioned the giving of a so-called “Williams instruction,” see State v. Williams, 137 N.H. 343 (1993) (requiring the State to prove the charged acts occurred in the time frame alleged in the indictments), on his agreeing to an amendment of the indictments to conform to the evidence presented at trial. After oral argument, we…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Montejo v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Rogers v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ford v. New Hampshire Department of TransportationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- State v. BotelhoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- State v. BalchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. Jose Batista-SalvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2019
- State of New Hampshire v. James PerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.