Legal Opinion

State v. Glanville

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 28, 2000No. 98-450PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNadeau, J.

The defendant, Charles Glanville, was convicted after a jury trial in Superior Court (Lynn, J.) of attempted armed robbery. See RSA 629:1 (1996) (amended 1999); RSA 636:1 (1996). On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred by improperly amending his indictment, and by denying his motion to suppress evidence. We reverse and remand.

The defendant was charged with attempted armed robbery. The indictment alleged that the defendant

[pjurposely, in the course of attempting to commit a theft, entered the Bank of New Hampshire building on Main *632Street, Littleton, New Hampshire armed with a “BB gun,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Town of Wolfeboro v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  3. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  4. State v. SettleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. State v. PrevostSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NoucasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  2. State v. BeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  3. State v. DilboySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  4. State of New Hampshire v. James PerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  5. State v. MosconeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API