Legal Opinion

Horn v. Davis Electrical Constructors, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 16, 1990No. 1487PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This is a retaliatory discharge action brought pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. Section 41-1-80 (Cum. Supp. 1989). The case was tried before a judge and jury. Davis moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that (1) there was no evidence Horn had been actually discharged from his position, (2) there was insufficient evidence of a retaliatory motive, and (3) it was undisputed Horn did not receive a full medical release. The trial judge denied this motion. The judge ruled the jury only needed to decide whether Horn had been discharged in violation of the statute. The verdict form…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sventko v. Kroger Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Coleman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. SEA PINES PLANTATION COMPANY v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Burrow v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Clifford v. Cactus Drilling Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Powell v. WYOMING CABLEVISION. INC.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Horn v. Davis Electrical Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Raymond v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  4. Crosby v. Prysmian Communications Cables & Systems USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  5. North American Rescue Products, Inc. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API