Legal Opinion

Clifford v. Cactus Drilling Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1981No. Docket 51868PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right a lower court order granting a motion by defendant for summary judgment. We reverse.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether an employer may fire an employee on account of absences from work that were due to a work-related injury for which the employee is entitled to compensation benefits. The few pertinent facts of this case are summarized in the dissenting opinion.

For purposes of determining the propriety of a motion for summary judgment, a trial judge must accept as true all of the nonmovant’s factual allegations as well as any reasonable inferences that could…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sventko v. Kroger Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Szydlowski v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Raymond R. Wiskotoni v. Michigan National Bank-WestCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Clifford v. Cactus Drilling Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. DiggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Barker v. Dayton Walther Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API