Legal Opinion

Grosso v. Grosso

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 29, 2000No. AC 18495PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HENNESSY, J.

The defendant, Edward Grosso, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court on his motion for modification of alimony. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) suspended his alimony payments, (2) concluded that the separation agreement could be enforced by the plaintiff in an independent action, (3) concluded that the plaintiff may request that alimony arrearages be paid out of nonliquid assets including real estate, (4) ordered the defendant to provide the plaintiff with financial affidavits and employment information every three months and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Turgeon v. TurgeonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prial v. PrialConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Winchester v. McCueConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Bijur v. BijurConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Distefano v. DistefanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  5. Thomasson v. Olszewski, No. Cv-01-0095876 (Jan. 31, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API