Legal Opinion
Distefano v. Distefano
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 15, 2002No. AC 21399PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, J.
The plaintiff, Joseph DiStefano, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for modification or termination of periodic alimony. The plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) refused to grant his request for a continuance when the defendant and her alleged cohabitant failed to produce subpoenaed documents, and (2) denied the plaintiffs motion for termination or modification of periodic alimony. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant. The court dissolved the parties’ marriage on October 14,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Borkowski v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Fahy v. FahySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Noce v. NoceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hyllen-Davey v. Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marshall v. MarshallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Cushman v. CushmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Alcoa Composites v. Connecticut Dep, No. Cv 01-0511202 S (Apr. 29, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002