Legal Opinion

Armour v. Wisconsin Gas Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1972No. 40PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The appellant city raises three issues:(1) Is the third-party complaint against the city for contribution barred by sec. 81.17, Stats. ?(2) Does the gas company have a cause of action against the city under the common law?(3) Is the gas company required to file a claim pursuant to sec. 62.25 (1) (a), Stats., before it can commence an action for contribution against the city?

Preliminary to discussing the issues raised, we restate the basic rule that upon a challenge by demurrer all facts well pleaded in the complaint are assumed to be true. Under this assumption it can be said that the city…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hayes v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. City of Madison v. Frank Lloyd Wright FoundationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Schwartz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Weiss v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Zillman v. Meadowbrook Hospital Co.New York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Thomas v. PrzbylskiWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Waldinger Co. v. P & Z CO., INC.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API