Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Przbylski

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1973No. 42432PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This case, one of first impression in Washington, presents a single issue: Must a defendant who joins a municipal corporation as a third-party defendant, seeking contribution or indemnification, comply with the claim statute, RCW 35.31, before he has made a payment to plaintiff or had judgment rendered against him. Our answer is No.

Whether a claim is against a charter city or a noncharter city or town, a claimant is required to file a claim within 120 days from the date “that the damage occurred or the injury was sustained.” 1

An accident on March 17, 1971, led to a suit for personal injury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cotham and Maldonado v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, and Third-Party v. City of Fond Du Lac, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  3. Roehrig v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  4. Armour v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Sziber v. StoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Smith v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Waldinger Co. v. P & Z CO., INC.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1976
  5. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Security Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API