Legal Opinion
Zillman v. Meadowbrook Hospital Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 23, 1973PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOLE AND THE 50-E PROBLEM
Bertram Harnett, J.
It is perhaps unusual to preface a legal
opinion with a headline. But, the now celebrated ruling of the New York Óourt of Appeals in Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. (30 N Y 2d 143), seems to have generated a legal concatenation so extended that special expression becomes commonplace in its wake. Witness Judge Bernard S. Meter’s fine article in the October, 1972 issue of The Nassau Lawyer, Dole v. Dow Chemical: What Hath The Court of Appeals Wrought?
The Dole decision pioneered the doctrine in New York that, in the same action brought by a tort-aggrieved…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railroad Company, and Third-Party v. City of Fond Du Lac, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Morgan v. McDermottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Royal Car Wash Co. v. Mayor and Council of W.Superior Court of Delaware · 1968
- Armour v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Rizzo v. SteinerNew York Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Markey v. SkogNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- Zillman v. Meadowbrook Hospital Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Green Bus Lines, Inc. v. Consolidated Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Firestone v. BerriosDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Garrett v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.