Legal Opinion

Ridley Investment Co. v. Croll

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 17, 1963No. 88PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Terry, Chief Justice.

On March 12, 1959, plaintiff, Ridley Investment Company, entered into a written contract which obligated de*210fendant to construct four post office buildings, including one at Milton, Delaware, which is the subject of the present controversy. The plans and specifications for the construction were prepared by plaintiff. When defendant began excavation, soft soil was discovered, and defendant immediately informed plaintiff of this condition. At plaintiff’s request, defendant engaged the services of an experienced workman in the field of foundation support, who recommended that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thomas Lonergan v. San Antonio Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Filbert v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  3. White v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Fuchs v. Parsons Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Glass v. WiesnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reiman Construction Co. v. Jerry Hiller Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ridley Investment Company v. CrollSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  3. Fanning & Doorley Construction Co. v. Geigy Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1969
  4. Farmer v. RickardWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Reiman Construction Co. v. Jerry Hiller Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API