Legal Opinion

Fanning & Doorley Construction Co. v. Geigy Chemical Corp.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided October 28, 1969No. Civ. A. 3152PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETTINE, District Judge.

This is a claim for payment of a balance due under a contract for the construction of a system of underground piping with a counterclaim by the defendant owner seeking liquidated and other damages. The American Insurance Company, defendant to the counterclaim, is the surety on the plaintiff’s performance bond.

Findings of Fact

Fanning & Doorley Construction Co., Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Fanning & Doorley”), the plaintiff in this action, is a Rhode Island corporation engaged in the construction business. Defendant, Geigy Chemical Corporation (hereinafter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Draper v. Oswego County Fire Relief Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Clark v. . WestNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. United States v. Henke Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Menard & Co. Masonry Building Contractors v. Marshall Building Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  2. L. M. White Contracting Co. v. St. Joseph Structural Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  3. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Havens Steel Co. v. Randolph Engineering Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  5. Northway Decking & Sheet Metal Corp. v. Inland-Ryerson Construction Products Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API