Kerr v. Hicks.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by John D. Kerr and wife S. H. Kerr against R. W. Hicks, beard by Judge W. A. Ilohe, at Eebruary Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of SakpsoN County. Erom a judgment for the plaintiffs, the defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Eubches, O. J.
This action was bi’ought by the plaintiff for an account and settlement with the defendant of transactions between them continuing through a number of years, and for judgment. Owing to the blanks in the pleadings, we are not able to tell just when these transactions commenced ■or ended. But from the statement in the record, they must have commenced as early as 1881 or 1882, and continued until 1888.
The action was commenced in October, 1891, and at December Term, 1891, there was a reference to W. R. Allen to take and state an account. This order was apparently a consent order.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. WorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Jones v. . BeamanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Bank of Tarboro v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Smith v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Grant v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Murchison National Bank v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Green Sea Lumber Co. v. PembertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Kerr v. Hicks.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- Smith v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.