Legal Opinion
Gallo v. Amoco Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 11, 1995No. 94 C 5916PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, Senior District Judge.
Five former employees of Amoco Coiporation (“Amoco”) have brought this class action against the Employee Retirement Plan of Amoco Corporation and Participating Companies (“Plan”) and Amoco (in its capacity as Plan Administrator)1 under Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA,” which comprises 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1368) §§ 1132(a)(1)(B) and 1132(a)(3). On behalf of themselves and of all other Amoco ex-employees who have received pension benefits under the Plan, plaintiffs seek to force Amoco to recalculate their pensions to include…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bank Leumi Le-Israel, B.M., a Foreign Corporation v. Dennis Lee, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- John Pokratz, Cross-Appellee v. Jones Dairy Farm, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gallo v. Amoco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2257, Pens. Plan Guide P 23929t Matthew J. Gallo, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Amoco Corporation, as Plan Administrator, and Employee Retirement Plan of Amoco Corporation and Participating CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Gallo v. Amoco Corp.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1996