Legal Opinion
20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2257, Pens. Plan Guide P 23929t Matthew J. Gallo, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Amoco Corporation, as Plan Administrator, and Employee Retirement Plan of Amoco Corporation and Participating Companies
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 24, 1997No. 96-1518Published
1Opinion of the Court
102 F.3d 918
20 Employee Benefits Cas. 2257, Pens. Plan Guide P 23929T
Matthew J. GALLO, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
AMOCO CORPORATION, as Plan Administrator, and Employee
Retirement Plan of Amoco Corporation and
Participating Companies, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 96-1518.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued Oct. 22, 1996.
Decided Dec. 17, 1996.
Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied Jan.
24, 1997.*
James R. Potter (argued), Miriam N. Geraghty, Jesse A. Wing, Kinoy, Taren, Geraghty & Potter, Chicago, IL, for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Christine M. Donato v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Gallo v. Amoco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.