Legal Opinion

Gallo v. Amoco Corp.

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided March 28, 1996No. 94 C 5916Published

1Opinion of the Court

*121 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff class members, having prevailed on the merits of this ERISA-based action (see 910 F.Supp. 396 (N.D.Ill.1995)), now seek to follow up on that victory by obtaining a fee-plus-expenses award under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1) against losing defendants Amoco Corporation (“Amoco”) and the Employee Retirement Plan of Amoco Corporation and Participating Companies (“Plan”). Because the parties have stipulated as to the amount of fees and expenses that are to be awarded if plaintiffs succeed in that effort (the sum of $174,565.18), the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Max I. Bittner v. Sadoff & Rudoy IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Emma Anderson v. Flexel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Davidson v. Canteen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. Gallo v. Amoco Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API