Legal Opinion

Thiti Lert Watana Co., Ltd. v. Minagratex Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 13, 2000No. C-00-0386-CRBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BREYER, District Judge.

Defendant ISG has moved to dismiss plaintiffs eighth, ninth and eleventh causes of action for conversion, negligence and civil conspiracy respectively. The grounds for this motion are that the claims are barred either by the statute of limitations set forth by the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (“COGSA”) or by the nine-month period of limitations set forth in paragraph nineteen of the Worldbridge bill of lading. Alternatively, defendant seeks to dismiss the conspiracy claim on the ground that it fails to meet the particularity requirements of Federal…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robert C. Herd & Co. v. Krawill MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Tessler Brothers (b.c.) Ltd. v. Italpacific Line and Matson Terminals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Barretto Peat, Inc. v. Luis Ayala Colon Sucrs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds' v. Barber Blue Sea LineCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Timco Engineering, Inc. v. Rex & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
  2. Capital Partners International Ventures, Inc. v. Danzas Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  3. Bigge Equipment Co. v. Maxpeed Int'l Transport Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API