Legal Opinion
Bigge Equipment Co. v. Maxpeed Int'l Transport Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 9, 2001No. 3:01-cv-01071PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT MARINE TERMINAL CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JENKINS, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Defendant Marine Terminal Corporation’s (“MTC”) motion to dismiss, or alternatively, for summary judgment, on the basis of the running of the statute of limitations. The motion requires the Court to determine whether Plaintiffs Bigge Equipment Co. and Dong-bu Insurance Co., Ltd. (collectively “Plaintiffs”) are time-barred from bringing suit for damage caused to cargo, in part, by MTC. For the reasons stated below, MTC’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Capital Partners International Ventures, Inc. v. Danzas Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004