Legal Opinion

Berg v. Hirschy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 14, 2006No. 0301-01065; A122624PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Plaintiffs appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their declaratory judgment action at the pleading stage. They assign error to the trial court’s determination that granting defendants’ motion to dismiss was proper because the case presented no justiciable controversy. We review for errors of law, Huang v. Claussen, 147 Or App 330, 332, 936 P2d 394, rev den, 325 Or 438 (1997), and affirm.

In considering the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ complaint, we accept as true its well-pleaded allegations and the reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom, but disregard any allegations that are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hale v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gaffey v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Hunter v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Menasha Forest Products Corp. v. Curry County Title, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  3. Hofer v. OHSUCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API