Legal Opinion
Arney v. Finney
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1992No. Nos. 91-3235, 91-3237 and 91-3295PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
These interlocutory appeals arise out of a class action suit involving the conditions at correctional facilities under the jurisdiction of the Kansas Department of Corrections. In appeals number 91-3235 and number 91-3237, appellants Jouett Arney and Randall Murphy raise three arguments. First, they challenge the district court’s authority to reopen a final order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Second, they argue that a federal district court has a duty to honor a “termination” of counsel motion that is filed by a majority of the plaintiff class. Third, appellants assert that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Woods v. EvattDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1995
- Gates v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PJ Utah, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Bobby Battle, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Park Anderson, and Simon Toppah, Applicant-In-Intervention-Appellant. Bobby Battle, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Park Anderson, and His Successor, and Jean L'aquarius, Applicant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Forest Guardians v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.