Legal Opinion

Bobby Battle, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Park Anderson, and Simon Toppah, Applicant-In-Intervention-Appellant. Bobby Battle, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Park Anderson, and His Successor, and Jean L'aquarius, Applicant-In-Intervention-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1993No. 92-7086PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

993 F.2d 1551

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Bobby BATTLE, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v.

Park ANDERSON, et al., Defendants-Appellees,

and

Simon TOPPAH,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United Nuclear Corporation v. Cranford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. Battle v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Michael Douglas McNeil v. William B. Guthrie, Michael Douglas McNeil v. William B. GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  5. Dennis C. Barsten v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jewell v. Bestbus Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Jewell v. BestbusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API