Legal Opinion

Oversmith v. Lake

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1940No. Docket No. 82, Calendar No. 41,222PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for damages for the abduction and false arrest and imprisonment of his six minor children. The trial court, sitting without a jury, concluded from the stipulated facts and evidence that plaintiff was entitled to judgment for $150. Because a question of probate practice is involved, we- granted leave to review the judgment.

The dispute arises out of a purported proceeding by defendants under Act No. 6, Pub. Acts 1907 (Ex. Sess.) (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 12834 et seq. [Stat. Ann. § 25.291 et seq.], repealed by the probate code of 1939, Act No. 288, Pub. Acts 1939), to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pickle v. PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Sinquefield v. ValentineMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Burkhardt v. BurkhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Thompson v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Karrib v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Brown v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  4. Cosner v. RidingerWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In the Interest of HewittSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API