Legal Opinion
Cosner v. Ridinger
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1994No. 93-220PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The problems presented in this case arise out of a claim of wrongful interference with parental rights. After his complaint was dismissed for failure to state a claim, this appeal was taken by Harlan B. Cosner (Cosner) who is the natural father of the child. The other parties include the mother (Ridinger), the maternal grandmother (Zimmerman), a second husband (Espy), and several attorneys, including the firm of one attorney, who represented the parties in proceedings relating to the custody and guardianship of the child. The primary issue is whether the complaint states…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Swanson v. BixlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of CommerceWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Leithead v. American Colloid Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- McEvoy v. HeliksonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- McBride v. MagnusonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Jeffrey R. Arnott v. Paula a/k/a Polly A. ArnottWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Meyer v. ConlonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Hoblyn v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- The Tavern, LLC, and SALL, LLC v. The Town of Alpine, Wyoming, and Nelson Engineering, a Wyoming CorporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.