Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Allegheny County Retirement Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 26, 1958No. Appeal, No. 233PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

We are called upon in this appeal to review once again the provisions of the Retirement Act of Allegheny County, and to determine the nature of the interests acquired thereunder by county employes.

The plaintiff, Harvey, began his employment with Allegheny County on May 1, 1928, as a guard in the County Workhouse and Inebriate Asylum. On that date, the Pension Act of May 8, 1919, P. L. 138, was in effect. The act provided for contributions by county employes to the County Pension Fund of one per cent of their monthly salaries. In return, upon reaching the age of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Retirement Board v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Teachers' Tenure Act CasesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Hickey v. Pittsburgh Pension BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Larsen v. Senate Of The Commonwealth Of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  3. Cianfrani v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Pineman v. OechslinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Association of Pennsylvania State College & University Faculties v. State System of Higher EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API