Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Giovenelli

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 20, 1933PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries caused by being attacked and bitten by the defendant’s dog. The circumstances of the' injury and the results thereof were alleged in the complaint, the final paragraph of which reads: “9. No act on the part of the plaintiff in any way contributed to said injury.” The defendant entered a general denial and the case was heard by Judge Ells April 20th, 1932, upon the issues thus joined. Over the objection of the plaintiff that it was inadmissible under a general denial, the court allowed the defendant to offer evidence that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Harris v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Kelley v. KilloureySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Ansell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Dorman v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Krawitz v. GanzkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Aaron v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. McCarthy v. DaunisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Hanson v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API