Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Carroll

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 3, 1947PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.

This is a statutory action for damages for injuries suffered by the plaintiff by reason of an attack by the defendant’s dog. The main defense is that the plaintiff was a trespasser on the defendant’s land at the time. The defendant has appealed from judgment for the plaintiff, assigning error in the finding and judgment. The facts the defendant seeks to have added to the finding are based upon his own testimony. His credibility was a matter for the trial court to decide.

The facts may be stated as follows: The defendant was the tenant of a farm in the town of Tolland. On July 9, 1945, he had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woolf v. ChalkerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
  2. Davis v. MargolisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Granniss v. WeberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Kelley v. KilloureySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  5. Dorman v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Garcia v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Martin v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
  3. Heathergreen Commons Condominium Ass'n v. PaulCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1985
  4. Verrilli v. DamilowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Sauerwein v. BellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API