Ansell v. City of Boston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rügg, C.J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for damage to the plaintiff’s automobile truck alleged to be due to a defect in a public way. It was provided in St. 1917, c. 344, Part IV, § 24, in force at the time the cause of action arose: "If a person sustains . . . damage in his property by reason of a defect or a want of repair . . . in or upon a way . . . and such . . . damage might have been prevented, or such defect or want of repair . . . might have been remedied by reasonable care and diligence on the part of the . . . city ... by law obliged to repair the same, he may,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Doherty v. Inhabitants of AyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Kelleher v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Wheatland v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Lunt v. Aetna Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Sterling v. Frederick Leyland & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Boston Edison Co. v. Board of Selectmen of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Murray v. Continental InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Sanford v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.